EP 3 474 205 A1 relates to the energy efficient delivery of mail items.
Brief outline of the case
The application was refused for lack of IS and lack of clarity.
The board confirmed the refusal.
In the present entry we will concentrate on the MR.
Further prior art cited by the board
Since D1 to D3 cited in the examination proceedings disclose few details of claim 1 and these documents appeared unsuitable as CPA,