The application relates to a solid-state image sensing apparatus and camera system.
Brief outline of the case
The application was refused as claim 1 of the MR and of AR1 and 2 lacked IS, and that claim 1 of AR 1 was lacking clarity.
In its decision,
Updates on EPC, PCT, EPO case law and the e-EQE
T 2703/18 – Restraint to be adopted by the SD and/or the ED when raising an objection of lack of unity – No SPV committed by the ED
by Daniel X. Thomas
Application EP 2 921 989 relates to a method for object recognition and/or verification on portable devices.
Brief outline of the case
The ED refused the application on the basis that the MR and AR 1 and 2 lacked IS, and AR 3 was not admitted under R 137(3).