EP 2 677 029 B1 relates to “Methods for the manufacture of proteolytically processed polypeptides”. It is base on a divisional application of EP 2 524 963 A1.
Brief outline of the case
The set of claims of AR 2 in appeal,
EP 2 677 029 B1 relates to “Methods for the manufacture of proteolytically processed polypeptides”. It is base on a divisional application of EP 2 524 963 A1.
Brief outline of the case
The set of claims of AR 2 in appeal,
EP 2 970 875 B1 relates to cell culture compositions with antioxidants and methods for polypeptide production in which hypotaurine plays an important role.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was maintained according to a new MR filed before the OD.
EP 2 900 191 B1 relates to a disposable absorbent article with extensive and retractable core.
Brief outline of the case
Claim 1 as granted infringed Art 123(2). The patent was maintained according to AR1.
Both proprietor and opponent appealed.
The patent relates to a method for oxidising ammonia and a suitable system.
Brief outline of the case
The OD decided to maintain the patent in amended form according to a ne MR filed in opposition. The opponent appealed.
In its communication under Art 15(1) RPBA, the provisional opinion of the board was that claim 21 of the MR was clear,
The patent relates to an electrical apparatus for the generation, transmission, distribution and/or usage of electrical energy, and to a method for determining an optimum amount of an adsorber for the adsorption of water and optionally further contaminants in such an electrical apparatus.
Brief outline of the case
The proprietor appealed the OD’s decision to revoke the patent as,