EP 2 966 358 A2 relates to a firing device.
Brief outline of the procedure
The application was refused for infringement of Art 123(2) of the MR and the applicant did not agree with grant on the basis of AR1.
Updates on EPC, PCT, EPO case law and the e-EQE
T 1137/20 – On the difficulties of drafting disclaimers – Measurement method in a piece of prior art under Art 54(3)?
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to an Al-Zn-coated steel sheet that exhibits excellent corrosion resistance after painting.
Brief outline of the case
Claim 1 as granted was lacking N over D4=EP 2 957 648, prior art under Art 54(3) which was not mentioned in the SESR.
T 88/21 – Disclaimer and priorities
by Daniel X. Thomas
The application relates to a strengthened glass article.
Brief outline of the case
The application was refused due to the insertion of an undisclosed disclaimer in the claims of the (then and current) MR did not fulfil the requirements of Art 123(2).
The application was filed on 22.07.2016.