by Daniel X. Thomas
The EBA is certainly in the position to defend itself.
I do however find it necessary to comment on the content of this anonymous TPO.
I think it was wise for the writer to stay anonymous.
The aggressive tone and the accusation of partiality are so strong that they are difficult to accept in general,
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 244 850 A2, published as WO 2016/115418 relates to the estimation of regional metabolic rate and blood flows of a subject’s organ, more specifically the brain, during endovascular interventions.
Brief outline of the case
The application was refused by the ED on the basis that the application did not satisfy the requirements of Art 123(2) and 54.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 296 282 B1 relates to a method for producing hydrohalofluoroolefins
Brief outline of the case
The opponent appealed the OD’s decision to maintain the patent according to AR3.
The proprietor filed with the reply to the SGA, AR 3-3a+ 4- 4a+5-5a.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 2 765 668 B1 relates to the simulation of an electrical power distribution network in a wind farm
Brief outline of the case
The OD revoked the patent and the proprietor appealed.
The OP was adjourned, and in the present case two OP took place.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 2 478 097 B1 relates to a stable liquid washing or cleaning agent containing a protease.
Brief outline of the procedure
The opponent filed an appeal after rejection of its opposition.
In T 0543/20, the patent was revoked.