EP 3 134 551 B1 relates to compositions and methods for enhancing and/or predicting DNA amplification.
Brief outline of the case
The OD maintained the patent according to AR7 and the opponent appealed.
The board held that claim 1 as maintained,
Updates on EPC, PCT, EPO case law and the e-EQE
T 1125/23 – How to manage not having any requests filed in appeal to be admissible
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 512 713 B1 relates to a value document having a security marking and a method for identifying the security marking.
Brief outline of the case
The OD decided that claim 4 as granted was to be objected under Art 83.
T 365/24 –Deletion of features and the “essentiality test”-Late filing of a request and not attending OP before the OD
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 889 761 A1 relates to a message processing method, a related apparatus, and a system.
Brief outline of the case
The application was refused in that the MR did not comply with Art 123(2) and 84 and that AR1-3 did not comply with Art 84.
T 1847/22 -Reordering requests before the OD might render them not admissible in appeal
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 085 344 B1 relates to a wound pad and a self-adhesive member comprising a wound pad.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was maintained according AR4.
Both proprietor and opponent appealed this decision.
T 2310/22- Let’s play with the admissibility of AR in which claims are deleted
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 092 035 B1 relates to systems, devices, and methods for detecting and treating cardiac arrhythmias and, more specifically to multiple device systems, whereby the therapy activity of a first implantable medical device methods is communicated to another implantable medical device.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was revoked as the OD considered that claim 1 as granted and all claims of AR1-30 were infringing Art 123(2).