by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 618 216 B1 relates to a method, a device and a system for controlling power of a wind farm.
Brief outline of the case
The OD rejected the opposition and the opponent appealed.
The OD did not admit the late ground of opposition under Art 100(b).
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 258 325 B1 relates to a timepiece shaft.
Brief outline of the procedure
The OD decided maintenance according to AR5 and the opponent appealed.
The board revoked the patent.
Claim 1 as maintained lacked IS over D3=EP 2 142 965 and D7=GB 2 416 408.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 121 274 B1 relates to a method for predicting responsiveness to the treatment of cancer with a compound inhibiting p300.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was revoked for lack of sufficiency for the patent as granted as well as for AR1-7.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 518 116 relates to a relates to a “layer-based file access” by a virtualisation instance.
Brief outline of the case
The application was refused by the ED and the applicant appealed.
During appeal, the applicant filed several requests.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 2 373 463 B1 relates to the preparation of a wood veneer plate.
Brief outline of the case
The oppositions were rejected and O II appealed.
The board found that the OD had committed a SPV,