R 7/21 – No postponement of OP – No violation of the right to be heard by Daniel X. Thomas date_range 08 Mar. 2024 chat_bubble 2 comments access_time 5 minutes CASELAW-EPO The patent relates to rituximab for use in a method for treating joint damage. Brief outline of the case Following 7 oppositions and two interventions, the OD revoked the patent. In decision T 2842/18, the board confirmed the revocation of the patent. An objection under R 106, Tags Art 112a / No representative of choice / Petition for review not allowable / Postponement of OP and right to be heard Read more