The present blog entry does not have the pretence to tell first instance divisions or the boards what should be done in case of a discrepancy between claims and description. It has even less the pretence to tell a post-grant court how it should interpret claims.
It is merely an attempt to come up with a systematic analysis and to deal with cases in which the description contains statements which lead to the conclusion that the claim wording could have a different interpretation in view of the disclosure in the description compared to that of the claim.