by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 2 628 464 B1 relates to a prosthetic valve
Brief outline of the case
The opposition was rejected and the opponent appealed.
The patent was eventually maintained according to AR 6’’.
The case is interesting as it deals with the admissibility of an intervention.
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent which is based on a divisional application EP 2 212 067 and relates to a conveyor drive for food slicing machine.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was maintained according to AR 0. Both proprietor and opponent appealed.
A notice of intervention was filed during appeal and considered admissible.