by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to a self-propelling battery driven lawn mower.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was maintained according to AR 6.
Both opponents appealed.
The board held that claim 1 of AR 6 was lacking IS over D2=DE 195 28 167 with common general knowledge.
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to a non-combustion suction type tobacco product that does not lighted to generate smoke from the tobacco product.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was maintained according to AR3.
The proprietor and both opponents appealed the decision.
The board held that the MR as well as AR 1,
by Daniel X. Thomas
The application relates to a viscoelastic plastic interlayer for vibroacoustic damping between two sheets of glass to form a laminated pane.
Brief outline of the case
The ED refused the application for lack of sufficiency.
The applicant appealed the decision.
The board decided that sufficiency was given and remitted to the ED for further processing.
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to an apparatus for limiting a current of a circuit or breaking a current of a circuit, and a method for controlling the apparatus
Brief outline of the case
The opponent appealed the rejection of the opposition.
The board held the appeal not admissible for lack of substantiation.
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to a curved vehicle windshield made from laminated glass, so as to avoid double images in Head-Up Display.
Brief outline of the case
The outline of the case is similar to that explained in the preceding blog.
In this blog we will discuss the non-admissibility of AR 2 and 3.