by Daniel X. Thomas
Brief outline of the case
The patent relates to a handle portion of a hand-held electric tool, whereby the battery pack has a triangular cross-sectional configuration.
Dependent claim 2 as granted was dependent on claim 1 as granted and claim 3 on claim 2.
During OP before the Board,
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent was maintained in amended form according to AR3.
The patent proprietors and the opponent appealed this decision. The proprietors withdrew their appeal in the course of the appeal proceedings. The patent was maintained as decided by the OD.
A “Notice of appeal” was filed on behalf of the opponent Insys Therapeutics,
by Daniel X. Thomas
Dear friends and colleagues,
Some of you have noticed that I have disappeared from LinkedIn. This is correct.
The LinkedIn chapter is closed for me. I will not dwell on it as it would not bring matters forward.
All along I received a lot of suggestions to start my own blog.