by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to an “Oven cabinet”.
Brief outline of the case
The OD revoked the patent and the proprietor appealed the decision.
The board confirmed that claim 1 as granted was adding matter as “comprising” was broader than “receiving”.
The board admitted AR1, set aside the OD’s decision,
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to a food composition for prodromal dementia patients.
Brief outline of the case
The present decision is the second decision in the case. In T 694/16, the decision to revoke for lack of sufficiency was set aside and the file remitted to the OD for further prosecution on the basis of,
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to long-acting formulations of insulin and has already been discussed in the present blog but under a different topic.
Brief outline of the case
The opponent appealed the decision of maintenance according to a new MR filed during OP before the OD.
In the summons to OP before the OD,
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent relates to long-acting formulations of insulin.
Brief outline of the case
The opponent appealed the decision of maintenance according to a new MR filed during OP before the OD.
In the summons to OP before the OD, the OD held that claim 1 as granted lacked N over D1=US 2004/048783,
by Daniel X. Thomas
The patent in suit pertains to a print supply cartridge comprising a microcontroller and dedicated hardware logic which is adapted to perform mathematical calculations according to a received timing challenge. The result of the calculations and the time taken are evaluated by a host device and used to authenticate the cartridge.
Brief outline of the case
The proprietor appealed the decision to maintain the patent in amended form according to AR2.