by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 2 923 528 B1 relates to a pane with an electric connection element and a connecting arm.
Brief outline of the case
The opposition was rejected and the opponent appealed.
In a communication under Art 15(1) RPBA the board provisionally informed the parties that the patent as granted lacked N over D2=CA 2 835 381,
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 2 991 507 B1 relates to a composition comprising fish oil and juice in an oil-in-water emulsion for use in treatment (and post-treatment) of cancer.
Brief outline of the case
The patent was revoked and the proprietor appealed.
In response to the board’s communication under Art 15(1) RPBA,
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 705 780 A2 relates to a magnet-thermocouple system for the positive safety supply of gas to burners or the like.
Brief outline of the case
The Receiving Section refuse the application under Art 90(5) in conjunction with R 58. Formal deficiencies under R 57 were not rectified in time.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 313 452 B1 relates to the preparation of an injectable cross-linked hydrogel
Brief outline of the case
The opposition was rejected and both opponents appealed.
None of the requests on file, as granted and AR1, were allowable due to lack of IS over D9=WO 2005/085329 as CPA.
by Daniel X. Thomas
EP 3 702 157 relates to a method and device for accurately laying sheets
Brief outline of the case
The patent was revoked and the opponent appealed (sic) the decision.
On the cover sheet (EPO Form 2330), the operative part of the decision incorrectly stated that the OD had rejected the opposition.